Eisenacher v. Dauphin County Superior Court et al
| Kristina Eisenacher |
| Dauphin County Superior Court, Dauphin County Clerk of Court, Charlie Hodgin, Does 1-10 and Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas |
| 1:2023cv01634 |
| October 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Christopher C Conner |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 RETURN OF SERVICE by Kristina Eisenacher (Attachments: #1 Verification of Return, #2 Envelope)(ll) |
| Filing 14 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons & First Amended Verified Writ of Habeas served on Charlie Hodgin on 11/27/2023, filed by Kristina Eisenacher. (ll) |
| Filing 13 Attempted Proof of Service on Charlie Hodgin by Kristina Eisenacher.. (ll) |
| Filing 12 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons & First Amended Verified Writ of Habeas served on Deborah S. Freeman, Dauphin County Court Administrator on 10/25/2023, filed by Kristina Eisenacher. (ll) |
| Filing 11 BRIEF IN OPPOSITION re #9 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Kristina Eisenacher.(ll) |
| Filing 10 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #9 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas.(Mallek, Megan) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Mallek, Megan) |
Filing 8
ORDER Re: Case Assignment and Procedures. Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 11/15/2023. (mw)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Megan L Mallek on behalf of Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas (Mallek, Megan) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, Charlie Hodgin and provided TO ATTORNEY VIA U.S. MAIL for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (sh) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: Parties have been updated from Amended Petition and Summons have been reissued. (sh) |
| Filing 5 Amended PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Kristina Eisenacher.(aaa) |
| Receipt of payment from STEPHEN EISENACHER in the amount of $5.00 for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Transaction posted on 10/3/2023. Receipt number 111101381 processed by AA. (jjs) |
| Filing 4 STANDING PRACTICE ORDER sent to Plaintiff. (ll) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (ll) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants and provided TO PLAINTIFF VIA U.S. MAIL for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (ll) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $5, Receipt Number 111101381), filed by Kristina Eisenacher.(ll) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
