SM Jewelry, LLC. v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company
| SM Jewelry, LLC. |
| Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company |
| 1:2023cv01878 |
| November 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Christopher C Conner |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER - it is hereby ORDERED that SM Jewelrys motion (Doc. 4) for remand is GRANTED. Hartfords cross-motion (Doc. 9) to consolidate is DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Court is directed to REMAND this case to Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas and to CLOSE this case. Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 1/10/2024 (mw)
|
| Filing 10 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 7.1 by SM Jewelry, LLC.. (Brenner, Thomas) |
| Filing 9 BRIEF IN OPPOSITION re #4 MOTION to Remand to State Court and Cross-Motion to Consolidate filed by Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company.(Masef, Adam) |
|
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER - Case Management Conference set for 2/15/2024 at 02:15 PM before Honorable Christopher C. Conner. At least five days before the conference,counsel shall file their joint case management plan with the court. Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 12/4/2023. (Attachments: #1 Term. Calendar)(mw)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER Re: Case Assignment and Procedures. Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 11/29/2023. (mw)
|
| Filing 6 COUNTY COURT RECORD from Court of Common Pleas Dauphin County. (sh) |
| Filing 5 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #4 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by SM Jewelry, LLC..(Brenner, Thomas) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Remand to State Court by SM Jewelry, LLC.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Nonconcurrence, #2 Proposed Order)(Brenner, Thomas) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company.(Gable, Richard) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 7.1 by Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. for Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company. (Gable, Richard) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company from Court of Common Pleas Dauphin County, case number 2023-cv-07724. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAMDC-6460478), filed by Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3)(sh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: SM Jewelry, LLC. v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: SM Jewelry, LLC. | |
| Represented By: | Thomas Edward Brenner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Adam Masef |
| Represented By: | Richard D. Gable, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
