Rosero v. Penhorwood et al
Dr. John C. Rosero |
Trooper Jacob Penhorwood, Trooper Shane R. Dressler, Colonel Robert Evanchik, Lt. Colonel Christopher L. Paris, Major Wayne C. Kline, Major Richard H. D'Ambrosio and Captain Bradley J. Getz |
1:2023cv01898 |
November 15, 2023 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
William I Arbuckle |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Receipt of payment from JOHN ROSERO in the amount of $402.00 for Civil Filing Fee- Non-Prisoner. Transaction posted on 11/15/2023. Receipt number 111101530 processed by SH. (jjs) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Major Richard H. D'Ambrosio, Trooper Shane R. Dressler, Colonel Robert Evanchik, Captain Bradley J. Getz, Major Wayne C. Kline, Lt. Colonel Christopher L. Paris, Trooper Jacob Penhorwood and provided TO PLAINTIFF VIA U.S. MAIL for service on Defendant(s) in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (ea) |
Filing 3 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number. (ea) |
Filing 2 STANDING PRACTICE ORDER. (ea) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $402, Receipt Number 111101530), filed by Dr. John C. Rosero. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Notice of Removal Documents)(ea) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.