Smith v. Franklin County Jail et al
Plaintiff: Michael Smith
Defendant: Franklin County Jail and Warden Christopher Schell
Case Number: 1:2023cv02037
Filed: December 8, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: EW
Referring Judge: Jennifer P Wilson
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 1, 2024 Filing 9 Second (UNCERTIFIED) MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael Smith. (ibr)
January 31, 2024 Filing 8 FIFTEEN (15) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER - Within 15 days of the date of this Order, the Warden or other appropriate official of the institution at which Plaintiff is currently incarcerated is directed to provide to the Court, under oath, or declare under penalty of perjury, a statement of the current balance in the Plaintiffs account and a record of the transactions in his account that have occurred with the preceding six (6) months. Order sent to Warden and plaintiff.Signed by LP on 01/31/2024. (lp)
January 19, 2024 Filing 7 (UNCERTIFIED) MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael Smith.(ep)
January 11, 2024 Filing 6 SECOND THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by LP on 01/11/2024. (Attachments: #1 IFP (civil rights))(lp)
January 11, 2024 Filing 5 Copy of original complaint by Michael Smith.. (lp)
January 11, 2024 Filing 4 Application to proceed in forma pauperis (incorrect filing fee and not fully completed) submitted by plaintiff. (lp)
December 8, 2023 Filing 3 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent, #2 AO 398 and 399 Waiver Forms, #3 Instruction Sheet, #4 Excerpts of Local and Federal Rules) (ibr)
December 8, 2023 Filing 2 (THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER) directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed on 12/08/2023. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application) (ibr)
December 8, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Michael Smith. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits) (ibr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Franklin County Jail et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Franklin County Jail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Warden Christopher Schell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?