Moyer v. O'Malley
| Dustin Moyer |
| Martin O'Malley |
| 1:2023cv02137 |
| December 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Daryl F Bloom |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CONSENTS to Proceed Before US Magistrate Judge Bloom in Direct Assignment Cases pursuant to Standing Order 2022-19. (jkc) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT FORM SENT (For Direct Assignment Cases to Magistrate Judges) to Dustin Moyer, Martin O'Malley YOU MUST SAVE THIS FORM TO YOUR DESKTOP. THEN OPEN THE SAVED FORM AND COMPLETE THE REQUIRED SECTIONS. DO NOT FILE THIS FORM IN THE CLERKS OFFICE. THE COMPLETED FORM MUST BE E-MAILED TO consents@pamd.uscourts.gov OR IF YOU DO NOT HAVE AN E-MAIL ACCOUNT YOU MAY MAIL THE FORM TO Clerks Administrative Assistant, Clerks Office, P.O. Box 1148, Scranton, PA 18501-1148. Consent Form due by 2/15/2024. (kjn) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Delores Montgomery on behalf of Martin O'Malley. (Montgomery, Delores) |
| Filing 4 STANDING ORDER 2022-26 in Social Security Appeals. (kjn) |
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court will notify the Commissioner of the commencement of the action by transmitting a Notice of Electronic Filing to the appropriate office within the Social Security Administrations Office of General Counsel and to the United States Attorney. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daryl F. Bloom on January 10, 2024. (kjn)
|
| Service Made Electronically - Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g), and the Court's Standing Order 2022-26, the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) using the Court's CM/ECF system notifying the Regional Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney for the Middle District of Pennsylvania of the commencement of this action. No summons shall issue. (kjn) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: Docket entry 3 was deleted due to a clerical error. (ll) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Dustin Moyer.(ll) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants lodged pending the disposition of the Motion for In Forma Pauperis, filed by Dustin Moyer. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ll) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Moyer v. O'Malley | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dustin Moyer | |
| Represented By: | Christopher M. Cassaza |
| Represented By: | Christopher J. Marzzacco |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Martin O'Malley | |
| Represented By: | Delores Montgomery |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
