Wright v. Rivello et al
Dwayne Wright |
John Rivello and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office |
1:2024cv00016 |
January 5, 2024 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
EW |
Jennifer P Wilson |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ORDER granting #15 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Signed by Honorable Jennifer P. Wilson on 2/23/2024 (ve) |
Filing 15 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus(Lodged with Motion for IFP) by District Attorney of Lancaster County, PA. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Gonzalez, Andrew) |
Filing 14 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #13 MOTION for Release Pending Trial filed by Dwayne Wright.(aaa) |
Filing 13 MOTION for Release Pending Trial by Dwayne Wright.(aaa) |
Filing 12 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Dwayne Wright.(aaa) |
Filing 11 SHOW CAUSE ORDER and Served on DA of Lancaster County, PA AG and resp. by 1st class mail (ma) |
Filing 10 ORDER: 1. The Clerk of Court shall SERVE a copy of the petn, #1 , and this Order on the Resps, the PA AGl, and the DA of Lancaster County.2. Within (21) days of the date of this order, Resps shall ANSWER the petn.3. Resps shall FILE a memorandum of law with the answer. 4. Petr may FILE a reply to the answer within (14) days of the date on which the answer is filed. 5. The Clerk of Court is to NOTE the address of the DA of Lancaster County, PA, on the front of the docket sheet in this case. All documents filed by the parties and by the Court shall be served upon the Lancaster County District Attorney and the Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General.6. The court will decide whether to hold a hearing on the basis of the Petn, Resps answer, and, if filed, Petrs reply. Signed by Honorable Jennifer P. Wilson on 2/5/24. (ma) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF ELECTION by Dwayne Wright. (aaa) |
Filing 8 ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER with Notice of Limitations on Filing of Future Petitions Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254. Signed by Honorable Jennifer P. Wilson on 1/9/2024. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Election)(ve) |
Filing 7 ORDER denying #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Petition, Doc. 1, is deemed FILED. Signed by Honorable Jennifer P. Wilson on 1/9/2024 (ve) |
Receipt of payment from SCI HUNTINGDON in the amount of $5.00 for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Transaction posted on 1/5/2024. Receipt number 111101715 processed by AA. (jjs) |
Filing 6 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 333 (lp) |
Filing 5 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent) (lp) |
Filing 4 CERTIFIED Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Dwayne Wright. (lp) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Dwayne Wright.(lp) |
Filing 2 MEMORANDUM OF LAW by Dwayne Wright. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Copy of Order from Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster in Criminal Case No. 4113-2018, #2 Exhibit B-Unsigned Statement RE: Dates with attached Petitioner's Affidavit, #3 Exhibit C-Copy of Criminal Court Docket/Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County)(lp) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged pending the disposition of the Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Dwayne Wright. (Attachments: #1 Wright v. Rivello Attachment/Grounds)(lp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.