Ramadan v. Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation
| Veronica Ramadan |
| Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation |
| 1:2024cv00104 |
| January 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Jennifer P Wilson |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without costs and without prejudice to the right of either party, upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, to reinstate the action if settlement is not consummated. Signed by Honorable Jennifer P. Wilson on 3/12/2024. (ve)
|
| Filing 10 Letter from Samuel Dion, Esq re case settlement. (Dion, Samuel) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Signed by Honorable Jennifer P. Wilson on 2/6/2024 (ve)
|
| Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint , or to file a motion or other response re #1 Complaint by Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Concurrence, #3 Certificate of Service)(Cabrera, Jason) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Jason A. Cabrera on behalf of Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation (Cabrera, Jason) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth A. Malloy on behalf of Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation (Malloy, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Veronica Ramadan. Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation served on 1/25/2024, answer due 2/15/2024. (Dion, Samuel) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER re: Motions to Dismiss. Signed by Honorable Jennifer P. Wilson on 1/26/2024. (ve)
|
| Filing 3 Letter to Counsel re: Case Assignment and Procedures. Signed by Honorable Jennifer P. Wilson. (ve) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (ll) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $405, Receipt Number APAMDC-6521378), filed by Veronica Ramadan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ll) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ramadan v. Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Veronica Ramadan | |
| Represented By: | Samuel Dion |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth A. Malloy |
| Represented By: | Jason A. Cabrera |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
