Darin Smith and Julia Smith on behalf of A.S. et al v. St. Margaret Mary School
| Darin Smith and Julia Smith on behalf of A.S., Darin Smith and Julia Smith |
| St. Margaret Mary School |
| 1:2024cv00156 |
| January 26, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Jennifer P Wilson |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER - AND NOW, on this 25th day of March 2024, upon Plaintiffs filing an amended complaint, Doc. 14, as of right pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15, IT IS ORDERED THAT Defendants motion to dismiss, Doc. 11, is DENIED as moot. Signed by Honorable Jennifer P. Wilson on 3/25/2024 (ve)
|
| Filing 15 RESPONSE by Darin Smith and Julia Smith on behalf of A.S., Darin Smith, Julia Smith to Show Cause. (Cox, Anthony) |
| Filing 14 AMENDED COMPLAINT as of right against St. Margaret Mary School, filed by Darin Smith and Julia Smith on behalf of A.S., Darin Smith, Julia Smith.(Cox, Anthony) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - AND NOW, on this 25th day of March 2024, IT IS ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs shall show cause by no later than April 1, 2024, why Defendants motion to dismiss, Doc. 11, should not be deemed unopposed for failure to file a response by the deadline of March 21, 2024. Signed by Honorable Jennifer P. Wilson on 3/25/2024. (ve)
|
| Filing 12 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #11 MOTION to Dismiss filed by St. Margaret Mary School.(Hackman, Richard) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss by St. Margaret Mary School. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hackman, Richard) |
| Filing 10 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 7.1 by St. Margaret Mary School. (Hackman, Richard) |
|
Filing 9
Order approving re #8 Stipulation. Signed by Honorable Jennifer P. Wilson on 2/15/2024. (ve)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION (Joint) as to Motion to Dismiss by St. Margaret Mary School. (Hackman, Richard) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Harlan William Glasser on behalf of St. Margaret Mary School (Glasser, Harlan) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard L. Hackman on behalf of St. Margaret Mary School (Hackman, Richard) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Darin Smith and Julia Smith on behalf of A.S., Darin Smith, Julia Smith. St. Margaret Mary School served on 2/1/2024, answer due 2/22/2024. (Cox, Anthony) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER re: Motions to Dismiss. Signed by Honorable Jennifer P. Wilson on 1/26/2024. (ve)
|
| Filing 3 Letter to Counsel re: Case Assignment and Procedures. Signed by Honorable Jennifer P. Wilson. (ve) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (aaa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against St. Margaret Mary School ( Filing fee $405, Receipt Number APAMDC-6527066), filed by Darin Smith and Julia Smith on behalf of A.S., Darin Smith, Julia Smith. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s) A, #3 B, #4 C, #5 D)(aaa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
