Rojek v. Dionese et al
| Jennifer Rojek |
| Christine Dionese and Stephen Fling |
| 1:2024cv00222 |
| February 7, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Yvette Kane |
| Susan E Schwab |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Conference set for 4/16/2024 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab. See Order for additional details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab on 4/5/24. (ae)
|
| Filing 9 CONSENT to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge Approved. The parties in the captioned action have advised the Court that they consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. #8 ). THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT the Clerk of Court shall reassign the above captioned action to Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab in the Harrisburg Division. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 4/4/24. (dmn) |
| Filing 8 JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN consenting to jurisdiction of a magistrate judge. (Murphy, Joseph) Modified on 4/4/2024 (jw). |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: The Case Management Conference scheduled before Judge Kane on April 23, 2024 is cancelled. (dmn) |
|
Filing 7
SCHEDULING ORDER: A Case Management conference will be conducted by the court on April 23, 2024, at 10:30 a.m. The court prefers to hold this conference by telephone. Plaintiff's counsel shall initiate this telephone conference. The telephone number of the court is 717-221-3990. Counsel should be prepared to address any pending motions at the conference. Counsel are advised to comply with Rule 16.3(a) of the Rules of Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. Local Rule 16.3 requires lead counsel for each party to meet prior to the case management conference and complete a "Joint Case Management Plan" form. The completed form, which is set forth in Appendix A of the local rules, must be filed jointly by the parties on or before April 16, 2024. See Order for complete details. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 3/18/24. (dmn)
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Christine Dionese.(Murphy, Joseph) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: Defendant Stephen Fling terminated pursuant to Stipulation of Dismissal (Doc. #5 ). (dmn) |
| Filing 5 STIPULATION of Dismissal of Less than All Defendants by Plaintiff Pursuant to R.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) by Stephen Fling. (Murphy, Joseph) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph F. Murphy on behalf of Christine Dionese, Stephen Fling (Murphy, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 Letter to Counsel re: Case Assignment and Procedures. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 2/7/24. (dmn) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (ibr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $405, Receipt Number APAMDC-6538721), filed by Jennifer Rojek. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ibr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
