Vargas v. Christensen
Petitioner: Juan Benjamin Vargas
Respondent: Warden D. Christensen
Case Number: 1:2024cv00302
Filed: February 20, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: LT
Referring Judge: Christopher C Conner
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 3, 2024 Filing 8 RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS by D. Christensen by D. Christensen. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Exhibit Cover and Index, #2 Exhibit(s) Ex. 1, Vegh Decl, #3 Exhibit(s) Attach. A, #4 Exhibit(s) Attach. B, #5 Exhibit(s) Attach. C, #6 Exhibit(s) Attach. D, #7 Exhibit(s) Attach. E, #8 Exhibit(s) Attach. F, #9 Exhibit(s) Attach. G, #10 Exhibit(s) Attach. H, #11 Exhibit(s) Attach. I, #12 Exhibit(s) Attach. J, #13 Exhibit(s) Attach. K, #14 Exhibit(s) Attach. L, #15 Exhibit(s) Attach. M, #16 Exhibit(s) Attach. N, #17 Unpublished Opinion(s))(Swauger, Melissa)
March 14, 2024 Filing 7 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Juan Benjamin Vargas. (ibr)
March 14, 2024 Filing 6 MOTION to Consolidate, MOTION to Appoint Counsel, MOTION for Hearing filed by Juan Benjamin Vargas. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Juan Vargas, #2 Declaration of Jeremy Pinson) (ibr)
March 14, 2024 Filing 5 SHOW CAUSE ORDER and Petition for habeas Corpus Served on US Attorney. (mw)
March 13, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to SERVE a copy of the petition (Doc. 1) and this order on respondent and the United States Attorney. All documents filed by the parties and by the Court shall be served upon the United States Attorney. Respondent shall file, within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this order, an answer to the petition. Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 3/13/2024. (mw)
March 12, 2024 Receipt of payment from UNITED STATES TREASURY in the amount of $5.00 for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Transaction posted on 3/8/2024. Receipt number 111101975 processed by SH. (jjs)
February 20, 2024 Filing 3 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent) (ibr)
February 20, 2024 Filing 2 (THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER) directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed on 02/20/2024. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application) (ibr)
February 20, 2024 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Juan Benjamin Vargas.(ibr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vargas v. Christensen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Juan Benjamin Vargas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden D. Christensen
Represented By: George Michael Thiel
Represented By: Richard D Euliss
Represented By: Melissa Swauger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?