Vargas v. Christensen
Juan Benjamin Vargas |
Warden D. Christensen |
1:2024cv00302 |
February 20, 2024 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
LT |
Christopher C Conner |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS by D. Christensen by D. Christensen. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Exhibit Cover and Index, #2 Exhibit(s) Ex. 1, Vegh Decl, #3 Exhibit(s) Attach. A, #4 Exhibit(s) Attach. B, #5 Exhibit(s) Attach. C, #6 Exhibit(s) Attach. D, #7 Exhibit(s) Attach. E, #8 Exhibit(s) Attach. F, #9 Exhibit(s) Attach. G, #10 Exhibit(s) Attach. H, #11 Exhibit(s) Attach. I, #12 Exhibit(s) Attach. J, #13 Exhibit(s) Attach. K, #14 Exhibit(s) Attach. L, #15 Exhibit(s) Attach. M, #16 Exhibit(s) Attach. N, #17 Unpublished Opinion(s))(Swauger, Melissa) |
Filing 7 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Juan Benjamin Vargas. (ibr) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Consolidate, MOTION to Appoint Counsel, MOTION for Hearing filed by Juan Benjamin Vargas. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Juan Vargas, #2 Declaration of Jeremy Pinson) (ibr) |
Filing 5 SHOW CAUSE ORDER and Petition for habeas Corpus Served on US Attorney. (mw) |
Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to SERVE a copy of the petition (Doc. 1) and this order on respondent and the United States Attorney. All documents filed by the parties and by the Court shall be served upon the United States Attorney. Respondent shall file, within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this order, an answer to the petition. Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 3/13/2024. (mw) |
Receipt of payment from UNITED STATES TREASURY in the amount of $5.00 for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Transaction posted on 3/8/2024. Receipt number 111101975 processed by SH. (jjs) |
Filing 3 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent) (ibr) |
Filing 2 (THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER) directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed on 02/20/2024. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application) (ibr) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Juan Benjamin Vargas.(ibr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Vargas v. Christensen | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Juan Benjamin Vargas | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Warden D. Christensen | |
Represented By: | George Michael Thiel |
Represented By: | Richard D Euliss |
Represented By: | Melissa Swauger |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.