Rodriguez v. John/Jane Doe
| Julio C. Rodriguez |
| M.D. John/Jane Doe |
| 1:2024cv00478 |
| March 19, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| LT |
| Christopher C Conner |
| Other Immigration Action |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent) (lp) |
| Filing 5 Case transferred electronically in from District of New York Southern; Case Number 1:24-cv-01376 containing electronic documents. |
| MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 4. Mailed to: Julio C. Rodriguez 217009903 Moshanno Valley Processing Center 555 Geo Drive Unit B3 Philipsburg, PA 16866. (rdz) [Transferred from New York Southern on 3/19/2024.] |
| CASE TRANSFERRED OUT ELECTRONICALLY from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York to the United States District Court - District of Middle District of Pennsylvania. (mml) [Transferred from New York Southern on 3/19/2024.] |
Filing 4
TRANSFER ORDER: The Clerk of Court is directed to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. All pending motions are to be adjudicated by the transferee court. An order to answer shall not issue from this Court. This Order closes this action in this Court. Because the Petition makes no substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. 2253. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Margaret M. Garnett on 3/8/2024) (mml) Transmission to Office of the Clerk of Court for processing. [Transferred from New York Southern on 3/19/2024.]
|
| Filing 3 APPLICATION for the Court to Request Counsel. Document filed by Julio C. Rodriguez..(rdz) [Transferred from New York Southern on 3/19/2024.] |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Order to Show Cause. Document filed by Julio C. Rodriguez..(rdz) [Transferred from New York Southern on 3/19/2024.] |
| Filing 1 WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (Filing Fee $ 5.00, Receipt Number 26704)Document filed by Julio C. Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Receipt).(rdz) [Transferred from New York Southern on 3/19/2024.] |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) [Transferred from New York Southern on 3/19/2024.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rodriguez v. John/Jane Doe | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Julio C. Rodriguez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: M.D. John/Jane Doe | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
