Zaragoza v. Prime Care Employee Jane Doe's et al
| Enio Fico Zaragoza |
| Prime Care Employee Jane Doe's, Prime Care Employee John Doe's and Central Booking Dauphin County |
| 1:2024cv01464 |
| August 28, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| EW |
| Jennifer P Wilson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent, #2 AO 398 and 399 Waiver Forms, #3 Instruction Sheet, #4 Excerpts of Local and Federal Rules) (ibr) |
| Filing 3 FIFTEEN (15) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER - Within 15 days of the date of this Order, the Warden or other appropriate official of the institution at which Plaintiff is currently incarcerated is directed to provide to the Court, under oath, or declare under penalty of perjury, a statement of the current balance in the Plaintiffs account and a record of the transactions in his account that have occurred with the preceding six (6) months. Signed on 08/28/2024. (ibr) |
| Filing 2 UNCERTIFIED MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Enio Fico Zaragoza.(ibr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants lodged pending the disposition of the Motion for In Forma Pauperis, filed by Enio Fico Zaragoza. (ibr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
