Sickler v. O'Mailey
| Cynthia Sickler |
| Martin O'Malley |
| 1:2024cv01718 |
| October 9, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Susan E Schwab |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER: Status Report due by 12/11/2024. See Order for additional details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab on 11/20/24. (ae)
|
| Filing 7 CONSENTS to Proceed Before US Magistrate Judge Schwab in Direct Assignment Cases pursuant to Standing Order 2022-19. (jkc) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT FORM SENT (For Direct Assignment Cases to Magistrate Judges) to Martin O'Mailey, Cynthia Sickler YOU MUST SAVE THIS FORM TO YOUR DESKTOP. THEN OPEN THE SAVED FORM AND COMPLETE THE REQUIRED SECTIONS. DO NOT FILE THIS FORM IN THE CLERKS OFFICE. THE COMPLETED FORM MUST BE E-MAILED TO consents@pamd.uscourts.gov OR IF YOU DO NOT HAVE AN E-MAIL ACCOUNT YOU MAY MAIL THE FORM TO Scranton Operations Supervisor, Clerks Office, P.O. Box 1148, Scranton, PA 18501-1148. Consent Form due by 11/27/2024 (ae) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Abby Elizabeth Rill on behalf of Martin O'Mailey. (Rill, Abby) |
| Filing 4 STANDING ORDER 2022-26 in Social Security Appeals. (ae) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The complaint is now deemed filed. The Clerk of Court is directed to serve Sickler's complaint in accordance with Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Cases and Standing Order No. 2022-26. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab on 10/25/24. (ae)
|
| Service Made Electronically - Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g), and the Court's Standing Order 2022-26, the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) using the Court's CM/ECF system notifying the Regional Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney for the Middle District of Pennsylvania of the commencement of this action. No summons shall issue. (ae) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Cynthia Sickler.(aaa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Martin O'Mailey lodged pending the disposition of the Motion for In Forma Pauperis, filed by Cynthia Sickler. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(aaa) (Attachment 1 replaced on 10/9/2024) (aaa). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sickler v. O'Mailey | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cynthia Sickler | |
| Represented By: | Patrick J. Best |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Martin O'Malley | |
| Represented By: | Abby Elizabeth Rill |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
