Aikens v. Harrisburg Police et al
| Darrell Aikens |
| Adult Probation, Jaobbi Harper, Jed Robbins, Dan Kinzinger and Harrisburg Police |
| 1:2024cv01986 |
| November 18, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Daryl F Bloom |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SECOND THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by lp on 01/02/2025. (Attachments: #1 IFP (civil rights))(lp) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFIED Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Darrell Aikens. (nr) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFIED MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Darrell Aikens.(nr) Modified on 1/2/2025 (lp).plaintiff failed to sign authorization section of the form |
| Filing 2 THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by LP on 11/20/2024. (Attachments: #1 IFP (civil rights))(lp) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Darrell Aikens.(rw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
