Riley v. Meyers, et al
| James W. Riley |
| Robert W. Meyers and Mike Fisher |
| 3:2000cv01183 |
| June 30, 2000 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Centre |
| Richard P. Conaboy |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry)For the reasons discussed above, Petitioner, James W. Rileys, Independent Action for Relief from Final Order, or Alternatively, Motion for Relief from Final Order Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 60( b) (Doc. 19) is DENIED. Because Petitioner has not come close to making the required threshold showing and the Court denied the motion after a thorough and generous review of the record in this case and similar habeas petition, the Court finds no ba sis to appoint counsel. Therefore, Petitioners Motion for the Appointment of Habeas Corpus Counsel under The Criminal Justice Act 18 U.S.C. § 3006(A) (Doc. 20) is DENIED. An appropriate Order is filed simultaneously with this Memorandum. re [1 9] MOTION for Relief from Judgment 17 Memorandum re R&R (Order to follow as separate docket entry),, 18 Order on Motion to Vacate, Order on Report and Recommendations,,,, filed by James W. Riley Signed by Honorable Richard P. Conaboy on 5/1/18. (cc)
|
|
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry)For the reasons discussed above, we adopt the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 15) as modified. Petitioners Motion Requesting to Vacate Judgment Entered on September 22nd, 2000, Due to Exceptional Circumstances in the Discovery of Previous Unavailable Evidence and an Intervening Change in Controlling Law Pertaining to Petitioners First Timely Filed Habeas Petition Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b)(2) and 60(b)(6) Providing Extraordinary Relief (Doc. 12) is denied. We also conclude there is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability. An Appropriate Order is filed simultaneously with this Memorandum.Signed by Honorable Richard P. Conaboy on 5/1/14. (cc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
