Supinski v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
| 3:2006cv00793 |
| April 14, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Thomas M. Blewitt |
| Thomas I. Vanaskie |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
365
ORDER re 364 Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:(1)Plaintiffs Motion for Attorneys Fees (Doc. 290) is GRANTED in part in the amount of $229,523.27 in fees and costs. Plaintiff is awarded $ 166,412.50 for Cynthia L. Pollicks fees, $31,057.50 for legal assistant fees, $24,870.00 in legal researcher fees, and $7,183.27 in costs. (2)Plaintiffs Motion for Consideration of Defense Counsels Time Records and Billing Invoices and Statements (Doc. 291) is DENIED.(3)Plaintiffs Motion for Pre-Judgment Interest on Back Pay Award (Doc. 300) is GRANTED in part. The judgment is hereby amended to include pre-judgment interest in the amount of $170,432.89 against Defendant Unit ed Parcel Service, Inc.(4)Plaintiffs Motion for Negative Tax Implications (Doc. 305) is DENIED.(5)Defendants Motion for Bond Approval (Doc. 351) is GRANTED. Execution of the judgment and all orders made final thereby are STAYED until further Order of this Court. The proposed bond attached to Defendants motion is APPROVED and shall be posted following entry of this Order.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 7/16/12. (jam, )
|
|
Filing
349
ORDER re 348 Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Relief from an Order Pursuant to Rule 60(b) (Doc. 343) is DENIED. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 6/5/12. (jam, )
|
|
Filing
342
ORDER re 341 Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry), Motions terminated: 309 MOTION to Stay re 299 Judgment filed by United Parcel Service, Inc. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Stay Judgment (Doc. 309) is DENIED. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 5/9/12. (jam, )
|
|
Filing
339
ORDER re 338 Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry), Motions terminated: 293 MOTION for Contempt since Defendant has not complied with this Court's Order of 2/17/2012 filed by Edward M. Supinski.IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Contempt (Doc. 293) is DENIED. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 4/30/12. (jam, )
|
|
Filing
298
ORDER re 297 Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:(1) Defendants Motion to Preclude, or in the Alternative, Limit Back Pay (Doc. 271) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:(a) The motion is GRAN TED as to the reduction of Mr. Supinskis back pay award by the amount he received in workers compensation payments.(b) The motion is DENIED in all other respects.(2) Defendant must pay Plaintiff $342,798.40 in back pay.(3) Defendants Motion to S trike Brief in Opposition, Plaintiffs Newly Created Post-Trial Documents and Any Arguments Based Upon Them (Doc. 287) is DENIED as moot.(4) Plaintiffs Motion to Strike Motion to Strike (Doc. 296) is DENIED as moot.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 3/6/12. (jam, )
|
|
Filing
138
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER 1. Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. Entry 77) is GRANTED. 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff. 3. The Clerk of Court is further directed to mark this consolidated action CLOSED. Signed by Honorable Thomas I. Vanaskie on 2/11/10. (jfg)
|
|
Filing
62
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER 1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. Entry 57) is ADOPTED IN PART. 2. Defendants Joint Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: A. Plaintiffs claims in Count IV against Defendants Cline and Newcomer are DISMISSED, and the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants Cline and Newcomer.B. Plaintiffs claims of retaliation asserted in Counts I and III of the Complaint are DISMISSED, and the Clerk of Court is dir ected to enter judgment in favor of Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc. on Plaintiffs claims of retaliation. C. Plaintiffs claim that he falls within the definition of disability set forth in the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Pennsylvania Humans Relations Act because he is substantially limited in a major life activity is DISMISSED. D. The motion for summary judgment on the ground that Plaintiff is unable to present evidence that he is regarded as disabled is DENIED. E. A telephonic scheduling conference will be held on February 19, 2009, at 10:00 a.m. Plaintiffs counsel is responsible for making the arrangements for the conference call.Signed by Honorable Thomas I. Vanaskie on 1/16/09. (jfg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Supinski v. United Parcel Service, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
