Luzier v. Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry et al
Plaintiff: Marlene M. Luzier
Defendant: Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry
Case Number: 3:2006cv01590
Filed: August 16, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Scranton Office
County: Dauphin
Presiding Judge: James M. Munley
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 2, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 68 MEMORANDUM and ORDER denying 63 dft's Motion in Limine to exclude the testimony of Dr. Scott Mueller.Signed by Honorable James M. Munley on 10/2/08 (sm, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Luzier v. Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marlene M. Luzier
Represented By: Jennifer A. Nachamkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry
Represented By: M. Abbegael Giunta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?