Transportation Insurance Company v. C.F. Bordo, Inc. et al
| 3:2006cv02386 |
| December 12, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Thomas I. Vanaskie |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
87
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER 1. Plaintiff Transportation Insurance Companys Motion for Summary Judgment(Dkt. 57) is DENIED.2. Defendant Pennsylvania Manufacturers Association Insurance Companys Motionfor Summary Judgment (Dkt. 52) is GRANTED.3. Pennsylvania Manufacturers Association Insurance Company has no duty todefend or indemnify C.F. Bordo in the underlying action captioned as Rasieleski v. C.F.Bordo, and docketed in the Court of Common Pleas for Lackawanna County, Pennsylvania(Dkt. 99-CV-3019).4. A Telephonic Status Conference shall be held on April 17, 2009 at 3:00 p.m.Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for making the call to (570) 207-5720 and all parties should be ready to proceed before the undersigned is contacted.Signed by Honorable Thomas I. Vanaskie on 3/30/09. (jfg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Transportation Insurance Company v. C.F. Bordo, Inc. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
