Pressley v. Huber et al
| Sean Pressley |
| Adam Huber, D. Zimmerman, Blaine E. Steigerwalt, Robert Marsh, Jr., Thomas Chambers, Ian Taggert, Donald Kelchner, Clifford O'Hara, Jeffrey Beard, Z. Moslak and Robert Bitner |
| 3:2008cv00449 |
| March 11, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Schuylkill |
| Edwin M. Kosik |
| LQ |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
163
ORDER: Final Pretrial Conference and Trial are CANCELLED and the Writ Issued to Pltf is VACATED; (CC: USM)Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 3/30/18. (ep)
|
|
Filing
159
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ; Thomas Chambers, T. Gerber, Donald Kelchner, Robert Marsh, Jr, Clifford O'Hara, Blaine E. Steigerwalt, C. Tabias, Ian Taggert, B. Taylor, Matthew Yohn, E. Ayers and Jeffrey Beard terminated.; granting in part and denying in part 127 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 145 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting 155 Report and Recommendations.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 2/27/18. (ep)
|
|
Filing
142
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry)1.Plaintiffs motion for relief from the March 21, 2017 Order pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b), (Doc. 126), is DENIED AS PREMATURE. 2.Insofar as plaintiffs Doc. 126 motion is construed as a motion for reconsideration with respect to the March 21, 2017 Order, it is GRANTED.(SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS)Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 8/1/17. (bs)
|
|
Filing
123
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry)1.Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 99) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.2.The motion is GRANTED to the extent that summary judgment is entered in favor of Defendants and aga inst Plaintiff with respect to Plaintiffs failure to exhaust the failure to protect claim and on the merits with respect to the due process cost assessment claim.3.The motion for summary judgment is DENIED without prejudice, with respect to Defendant s argument that Plaintiff failed to exhaust his excessive force claim.4.On or before April 21, 2017, a further motion for Summary Judgment, together with a brief in support and exhibits, may be submitted with respect to the exhaustion of administrati ve remedies on the excessive force claim, as discussed in the accompanying Memorandum. If no further dispositive motions are submitted in the time allotted, the matter will be scheduled for a final pre-trial conference and trial at the convenience of the court. Motions due by 4/21/2017.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 3/21/17. (bs)
|
|
Filing
90
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Defendants shall produce to Plaintiff withn fourteen (14) days only Section 1 entitled "General Practices: of the DC-ADM 201 manual subintted for in camera review. (Doc 74). 2. With in fourteen (14) days of this order, Defendants shall submit to the court for in camera review the DOC policies and manual with respect to Policy 6.5.1, Policy 1.7.5 and Policy 6.5.7 as previously directed by the court on July 25, 2011. 3. Plaintif f's motion for sancations (Doc 87) is DENIED. However, within seven (7) days from thed ate of this order, Defendants shyall file a status report specifically advising the court of the following: a. Whether additional medical information with re spect to Defendant Huber was obtained and, if so, provided to Plaintiff; b. Whether the serial number for the video camera was ever obtained and, if so, provided to Plaintiff; c. Whether any furhter responses to Defendant Beard's interrogatori es #22 and #23 were obtained and, if so, provided to Plaintiff; d. Whether Plaintiff ever provided responses to the supplemental interrogatories directed to Defendants Zimmerman, Kelchner, Moslak and Bitner; e. Whether the Plaitiff's ID photoes were ever provided to him. 4. A dispositive motions deadline will be imposed following the court's receipt and review of the outstanding in camera documents.Signed by Honorable Edwin M. Kosik on 2/12/2013. (cw)
|
|
Filing
85
MEMORANDUM - of courtSigned by Honorable Edwin M. Kosik on 1/31/12. (th, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
