Mitchell v. Rendell et al
| Stephen Mitchell |
| Edward G. Rendell, Jeffrey Beard, Joseph Piazza, David Verano, David McAnney, Wiseman McDonald and Kathleen Straussar |
| 3:2008cv00787 |
| April 28, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Northumberland |
| Edwin M. Kosik |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER directing the USM to serve a copy of the 58 Third Amended Complaint filed by Stephen Mitchell along with a copy of this Order on Defendants (see Order).Signed by Honorable Edwin M. Kosik on 3/16/2010. (bg, )
|
|
Filing
42
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order. The amended complaint shall properly allege all claims against all defendants that plaintiff wishes to raise. The amended complain t shall contain a simple, concise statement of the facts in numbered paragraphs, Fed. R.Civ.P. 8,10. The amended complaint shall be filed to the same docket number as the instant action and shall be entitled"Amended Complaint". The amended complaint shall be complete in all respects. Failure to timely file an amended complaint may result in a dismissal of the action. (See Order for further details).Signed by Honorable Edwin M. Kosik on 12/29/08. (ga, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
