Argentum Medical, LLC v. Noble Biomaterials et al
Plaintiff: Argentum Medical, LLC
Defendant: Noble Biomaterials and Derma Sciences, Inc.
Counterclaim Plaintiff: Derma Sciences, Inc.
Counterclaim Defendant: Argentum Medical, LLC
Third Party Defendant: Noble Fiber Technologies, LLC
Third Party Plaintiff: Derma Sciences, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2008cv01305
Filed: July 9, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Patent Office
County: Outside State
Presiding Judge: A. Richard Caputo
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 35:271 Patent Infringement

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 382 MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) re 381 Unopposed MOTION under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(5) filed by Gregg Silver, Thomas Miller Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 9/2/14. (jam)
September 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 360 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 306 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; denying 308 Motion for New Trial. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 9/23/11 (jam, )
December 7, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 208 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 197 Motion to Amend/Correct. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs/Cross-Claim Defendants Motion for Leave to Amend Answers to Assert Affirmative Defenses (Doc. 197) is DENIED. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 12/7/10 (jam, )
September 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 196 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 192 Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 9/21/10 (jam, )
July 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 188 MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 153 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 154 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 157 Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:1) The Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendants Derma and Noble (Doc. 153) is DE NIED. Count I of the Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 89) is DISMISSED for lack of standing. Counterclaim I brought by Noble in its Answer (Doc. 102) for a declaration of patent invalidity is DISMISSED for lack of ripeness.2)The Motion for Summary Judg ment of Plaintiff Argentum Medical (Doc. 154) is DENIED. 3)The Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant Derma (Doc. 157) is GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of Defendant Derma on Counts II, III, and IV of the Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 89). Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 7/1/10 (jam, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Argentum Medical, LLC v. Noble Biomaterials et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Argentum Medical, LLC
Represented By: Keith V. Rockey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Noble Biomaterials
Represented By: Josh M. Kantrow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Derma Sciences, Inc.
Represented By: Martin L. Stern
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counterclaim plaintiff: Derma Sciences, Inc.
Represented By: Martin L. Stern
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counterclaim defendant: Argentum Medical, LLC
Represented By: Keith V. Rockey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Third party defendant: Noble Fiber Technologies, LLC
Represented By: Josh M. Kantrow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Third party plaintiff: Derma Sciences, Inc.
Represented By: Martin L. Stern
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?