U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Montalvo et al
| U.S. Bank, N.A. |
| Antonio Montalvo, Sr. and Antonio Montalvo, Jr. |
| 3:2008cv01504 |
| August 11, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Monroe |
| A. Richard Caputo |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 Foreclosure |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
ORDER upon consideration of Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 39), all accompanying briefs, and Defendants' failure to produce evidence of any pending or present loan modification agreements, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:1. Plaintiffs Mo tion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 39) is GRANTED. 2. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANTS in this mortgage foreclosure action. 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the case.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 11/14/13. (jfg)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER 1. The Court defers ruling on Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 39). 2. WITHIN THREE (3) WEEKS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, Defendants shall submit documentary evidence of any pending or current loan modification agreements in place, to the extent they exist. 3. Upon receipt of Defendants' supplemental filings, the Court will rule on Plaintiff's pending Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 39). Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 10/15/13. (jfg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
