Holley v. Gelman
Plaintiff: Raymond D. Holley
Defendant: Norris E. Gelman
Case Number: 3:2008cv01710
Filed: September 15, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Schuylkill
Presiding Judge: A. Richard Caputo
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1331 Fed. Question

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 20, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 6) is DENIED. (2) The case is DISMISSED without prejudice. (3) The Clerk of the Court shall mark this matter CLOSED.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 10/20/08. (jam, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Holley v. Gelman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Norris E. Gelman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Raymond D. Holley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?