TD Bank, N.A., as successor to Commerce Bank, N.A. v. Feldman Lubert Adler Harrisburg, LP, a Pennsylvania limited partnership
TD Bank, N.A., as successor to Commerce Bank, N.A. |
Feldman Lubert Adler Harrisburg, LP, a Pennsylvania limited partnership |
3:2008cv02255 |
December 18, 2008 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Negotiable Instrument Office |
Dauphin |
William J. Nealon |
None |
Diversity |
28:1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: TD Bank, N.A., as successor to Commerce Bank, N.A. v. Feldman Lubert Adler Harrisburg, LP, a Pennsylvania limited partnership | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: TD Bank, N.A., as successor to Commerce Bank, N.A. | |
Represented By: | Barry E. Bressler |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Feldman Lubert Adler Harrisburg, LP, a Pennsylvania limited partnership | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.