Gentile v. Classic Design Homes, Inc. et al
Annmarie Gentile |
Classic Design Homes, Inc., Classic Quality Homes, Inc., David Wengerd and Steven Wengerd |
3:2008cv02330 |
December 31, 2008 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
Monroe |
Thomas I. Vanaskie |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 78 MEMORANDUM and OPINION -For the above reasons, the Court will grant in part and deny in part Defendants' Motion to Strike and Motion for Summary Judgment.As agreed to by the parties, the relevant portions of paragraphs 15,21,25, and 33 are stric ken from Plaintiffs Answer to the Statement of Facts. (Doc. 74, Ex. B). To the extent that paragraphs 16, 19,27,29,31,32,34,37,40,44,49,50,51,52,54,55,56,60, 64, 66 and the remainder of paragraphs 15, 25, and 33 are inflammatory, irrelevant, or merel y opinions or conclusions of law, the Court assigns no evidentiary value to them.The Court also grants summary judgment in favor of Defendants on Count I (pregnancy discrimination), Count III (tortious interference against Defendants DES and David We ngerd), Count IV (notice pay and with respect to Steven Wengerd), Count V(with respect to David Wengerd from the wrongful discharge claim), and Count VI (fraud). The claims remaining for trial are: Count I: sexual harassment based on gender and hosti le work environment for failure to take prompt immediate action, Count II: retaliation for engaging in protected activity, Count IV: WPCL and FLSA claims for maternity leave, overtime, and time worked, and Count V: wrongful discharge under public policy. The remaining defendants are DES, CQH, and CDH on all counts, except for Count IV under which David also remains as adefendant. A separate Order follows. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 7/9/12. (jfg) |
Filing 22 MEMORANDUM and ORDER granting in part and denying in part 13 dfts' Motion to Dismiss ; GRANTED re portion of pltf's amended complaint that seeks recovery under 43 291; DENIED in all other respects.Signed by Honorable James M. Munley on 2/16/10 (sm, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.