Medici v. Pocono Mountain School District et al
Michael Medici |
Pocono Mountain School District and Dwight Pfennig |
3:2009cv02344 |
November 30, 2009 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Scranton Office |
Monroe |
James M. Munley |
Malachy E. Mannion |
None |
20 U.S.C. ยง 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 ORDER granting 26 Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) The defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 26) is GRANTED. (2) Judgment shall be entered in favor the defendants and against the plaintiff. (3) The plaintiff's motion seeking leave to amend (Doc. 19) is DENIED. (4) The clerk of court is directed to mark this matter CLOSED. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 6/22/11 (jam, ) |
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 5 Motion to Dismiss. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Pocono Mountain School District and Dwight Plenning's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 5) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as foll ows: (1) As to Plaintiff Michael Medici's claim to enforce the favorable portions of the Special Education Due Process Appeals Review Panel's decision, the motion is GRANTED. (2) As to the remainder, the motion is DENIED. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 3/16/10. (jam, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.