Jordan Flickinger et al v. Toys R Us, Inc. et al
| Mary Elizabeth Jordan Flickinger, James Bradley Flickinger, D.J.F. and J.B.F. |
| Toys R Us, Inc., Toys R Us - Delaware, Inc., Toys R Us - Delaware Inc., Toys R Us Childrens's Fund, Inc. and Toys R Us - Value, Inc. |
| 3:2010cv00305 |
| February 9, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Lackawanna |
| A. Richard Caputo |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
252
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the parties remaining motions and motions in limine are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:(1)Toys R Us Motions in Limine to Preclude Expert Report and Testimony of Dr. Malloy (Docs. 210 and 244) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Dr. Malloys report will be precluded and he will not be permitted to testify as an expert, but he will be allowed to testify as a fact witness. (2)Toys R Us Motion for Sanctions (Doc. 214) is DENIED.(3)Toy s R Us Motion in Limine to Preclude Supplemental Reports of Andrew Verzilli, Jonathan A. Cunitz, and William Lazor (Docs. 226 and 242) is GRANTED.(4)Toys R Us Motion to Clarify (Doc. 219) is DENIED.(5)The remaining motions (Docs. 192, 195, 208, 212, 216, 222, 224, and 233) have been voluntarily WITHDRAWN.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 8/2/11. (jam, )
|
|
Filing
190
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 87 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 91 Motion in Limine; granting 93 Motion in Limine; granting 96 Motion in Limine; denying 100 Motion to Compel; denying 105 Motion for Order; granting i n part and denying in part 143 Motion in Limine; denying 158 Motion in Limine; denying 159 Motion to Quash. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:(1)Plaintiffs Motion in Limine to Apply Pennsylvania Law to Liability and Damages (Doc. 105) is DENIED.(2)Defe ndants Motion in Limine to Strike the Expert Reports of Neil Growney and Michael Pepe and Preclude their Testimony (Doc. 91) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Messrs. Growney and Pepe will be allowed to testify, but not as to any of the legal c onclusions in their reports.(3)Defendants Motion in Limine to Strike Expert Report and Preclude Testimony of Dr. Richard Fishbein (Doc. 93) is GRANTED.(4)Defendants Motion in Limine to Preclude Hearsay Statement Made by Unidentified Toys R Us Employe e (Doc. 96) is GRANTED. (5)Defendants Motion in Limine to Preclude Plaintiffs Experts from Offering Opinions Based on the Alleged Forces involved in the Incident (Doc. 143) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. (6)Defendants Motions in Limine to Pr eclude any Reference to Dr. Michael Lupinacci and to Quash Plaintiffs Subpoena to Appear and Testify directed to Dr. Lupinacci (Doc. 158 and 159) are DENIED.(7)Plaintiffs Motion in Limine to Compel Live Testimony from Toys R Us Employees (Doc. 100) is DENIED.(8)Plaintiffs Motion in Limine to Preclude the Expert Opinion of Dr. Stephen B. Wilcox (Doc. 87) is DENIED. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 5/31/11 (jam, )
|
|
Filing
150
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine to exclude the expert reports and testimony of Dr. Nobilini is GRANTED. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 4/29/11. (jam, )
|
|
Filing
30
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 20 Motion for Joinder. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 10/29/10 (jam, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
