Muniz v. Price et al
| Angel Muniz |
| Price, Ozlanski, Phillips, Davis, Navantil and John Doe |
| 3:2010cv00345 |
| February 17, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Montgomery |
| A. Richard Caputo |
| Martin C. Carlson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, Motions terminated: 49 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 26 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Ozlanski, Davis, Phillips, Navantil, PriceREPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 26 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Ozlanski, Davis, Phillips, Navantil, Price, 26 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Ozlanski, Davis, Phillips, Navantil, Price. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 49) is ADOPTED. (2) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 26) is GRANTED. (3) The Clerk of Court is ordered to mark this matter as CLOSED. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 3/3/11. (jam, )
|
|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - it is ORDERED that the Plaintiffs motion to compel, (Doc. 33), and motion to take oral depositions (Doc. 38) are DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on November 3, 2010. (kjn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
