Williams et al v. City of Scranton et al
Myron Williams and Louise Williams |
City of Scranton, City of Scranton Police Department, James Smith, Eric Jodan, Robert Stanek, Jason Knoch, Community Life Support, Kevin Joseph Yetkowskas, Dan Flynn, Lackawanna County Children and Youth Services, Pennsylvania State Police, Scranton Counseling Center, Community Medical Center and The State of Pennsylvania |
3:2010cv00388 |
February 22, 2010 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Scranton Office |
Lackawanna |
A. Richard Caputo |
Assault Libel & Slander |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 110 ORDER re 109 Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Scranton Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 90) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case as CLOSED. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 4/1/13. (jam) |
Filing 73 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 42 Motion to Dismiss; granting 43 Motion to Dismiss; granting 48 Motion to Dismiss. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:(1) The CLS defendants motion to dismiss the amended complaint (Doc. 42) is GRANTED.(2) Lackawanna Coun ty Children and Youth Services motion to dismiss the amended complaint (Doc. 43) is GRANTED.(3) Scranton Counseling Centers motion to dismiss the amended complaint (Doc. 48) is GRANTED.(4) Because the amended complaint is identical to the previous co mplaint, the Court sua sponte DISMISSES the amended complaint against the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the Pennsylvania State Police, and the Community Medical Center, as it did upon motion in its July 22, 2010 order (Doc. 33). (5) The plaintiffs have twenty-one days from the date of this order to file a motion seeking leave to file a second amended complaint in accordance with the Courts opinion. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 3/30/11 (jam, ) |
Filing 33 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 12 Motion to Dismiss; granting 14 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; granting 16 Motion to Dismiss; granting 18 Motion to Dismiss; granting 18 Motion to Dismiss Party; denying 19 Motion to Dismiss. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:(1)Defendant Lackawanna County Children and Youth Services's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint Against Defendant Lackawanna County Children and Youth Services Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for Fail ure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted, and Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(7) Alleging Failure to Join a Party Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19 (Doc. 12) is GRANTED.(2)Defendants the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania an d the Pennsylvania State Police's Pennsylvania Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 14) is GRANTED.(3)Defendant Community Medical Center's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) on Beha lf of the Defendant, Community Medical Center (Doc. 16) is GRANTED.(4)Defendant Scranton Counseling Center's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (Doc. 18) is GRANTED.(5)Defendants Community Life Support Systems , Inc., Kevin Yetkowskas, and David Flynn's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) is DENIED.(6)Plaintiffs have TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS from the date of this order to file a motion to amend their complaint. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 7/22/10 (jam, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.