Arlington Industries, Inc. v. Electronic Custom Distributors, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Third Circuit Pennsylvania Middle District Arlington Industries, Inc. v. Electronic Custom Distributors, Inc.

Arlington Industries, Inc. v. Electronic Custom Distributors, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Arlington Industries, Inc.
Defendant:	Electronic Custom Distributors, Inc.
Case Number:	3:2010cv00842
Filed:	April 21, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Scranton Office
County:	Lackawanna
Presiding Judge:	A. Richard Caputo
Nature of Suit:	Patent
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1338
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 15, 2011	Filing 43 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 8 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 9/15/11 (jam, )
December 20, 2010	Filing 20 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re 8 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Electronic Custom Distributors, Inc. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:(1) Arlingtons motion for jurisdictional discovery (Doc. No. 16) is GRANTED. Arlington will have forty-fiv e days from the date of this order to conduct discovery.(2) ECDs Rule 12(b)(2) motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 8) is STAYED pending discovery.(3) Supplemental briefing and evidence from Arlington will be due ten days after the close of the forty-five day discovery period. ECD will have fourteen days to respond with briefing and evidence, if any. If Arlington fails to file supplemental briefing, the court will consider only the prior filings in deciding the motion.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 12/20/10. (jam, )

Date Filed

Document Text

September 15, 2011

Filing 43 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 8 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 9/15/11 (jam, )

December 20, 2010

Filing 20 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re 8 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Electronic Custom Distributors, Inc. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:(1) Arlingtons motion for jurisdictional discovery (Doc. No. 16) is GRANTED. Arlington will have forty-fiv e days from the date of this order to conduct discovery.(2) ECDs Rule 12(b)(2) motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 8) is STAYED pending discovery.(3) Supplemental briefing and evidence from Arlington will be due ten days after the close of the forty-five day discovery period. ECD will have fourteen days to respond with briefing and evidence, if any. If Arlington fails to file supplemental briefing, the court will consider only the prior filings in deciding the motion.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 12/20/10. (jam, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arlington Industries, Inc. v. Electronic Custom Distributors, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arlington Industries, Inc.
Represented By:	Robert J. Tribeck
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Electronic Custom Distributors, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?