Williams v. Beard et al
| La-Qun Rasheed Williams |
| Jeffrey A. Beard, Ph.D., David A. Varano, Robert A. McMillan, Ronda M. Ellett, Therese Jellen, S. Gooler, James Faust, Peter M. Knarr, Jimmy Fetterolf, A. A. Kitchen, Kathryn McCarty, Davis and Michael Wiesner |
| 3:2010cv00979 |
| May 7, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Luzerne |
| Richard P. Conaboy |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
304
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry)Based upon the undisputed evidence submitted by Remaining Defendants, especially Millers declaration, there are no facts other than the Plaintiffs speculative contention which could support a claim that Knarr had any personal involvement whatsoever in the purported food tampering incidents of January 21, 2010 and January 26, 2010. Accordingly summary judgment will be entered in favor of that Defendant.It is equally apparent that although Defe ndant Peters was admittedly at work on the two dates at issues, there are no facts presented to show that he had any participation, knowledge or acquiescence in the alleged acts of food tampering. Based upon the undisputed facts, Peters is also enti tled to entry of summary judgment. (See Memorandum) re 247 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Peter M. Knarr, Therese Jellen, A. A. Kitchen, Jimmy Fetterolf, George Miller, Rhonda Tomcavage, S. Gooler Signed by Honorable Richard P. Conaboy on 9/3/14. (cc)
|
|
Filing
197
MEMORANDUM Since a review of the Amended Complaint shows that Plaintiff has not set forth any averments which could support a claim that either Anascavage or Davis had personal involvement in any constitutional misconduct and in light of Plaintiffs c oncessions that he has no facts whatsoever which could support a claim that they engaged in or acquiesced in the purported food tampering, entry of dismissal in favor of those two Defendants with respect to the wholly speculative claims asserted against them is warranted. An appropriate Order will enter.Signed by Honorable Richard P. Conaboy on 10/13/12. (cc, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
