Schroeder v. Verizon Pennslyvania, Inc.
Plaintiff: Marshall Schroeder
Defendant: Verizon Pennsylvania, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2010cv01305
Filed: June 22, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Scranton Office
County: Monroe
Presiding Judge: Unassigned1
Presiding Judge: Malachy E. Mannion
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 6, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER ADOPTING 27 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS DENYING 26 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Marshall Schroeder, GRANTING 18 Motion for Summary Judgment,, filed by Verizon Pennsylvania, Inc.; Signed by Honorable William J. Nealon on 07/06/11. (ep, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schroeder v. Verizon Pennslyvania, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marshall Schroeder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Verizon Pennsylvania, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?