Thorpe v. Borough of Jim Thorpe et al
| John Thorpe |
| Borough of Jim Thorpe, Michael Sofranko, Ronald Confer, John McGuire, Joseph Marzen, W. Todd Mason, Jeremy Melber, Justin Yaich, Joseph Krebs, Greg Strubinger, Kyle Sheckler and Joanne Klitsch |
| 3:2010cv01317 |
| June 24, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Carbon |
| Unassigned1 |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
111
ORDER re 110 Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:(1)The Borough of Jim Thorpes Motion for Summary Judgment Under the Probate Exception to Jurisdiction and the Doctrine of Laches (Doc. 93) is DENIED.(2) The Borough of Jim Thorpes Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 99) is DENIED.(3)Plaintiffs Richard Thorpe, William Thorpe, and the Sac and Fox Nation of Oklahomas Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 95) seeking a declaration as to the applicability of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act is GRANTED. The Borough of Jim Thorpe is a museum under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act and subject to the requirements of the Act, including those provisions governing repatriation requests. See 25 U.S.C. §§ 3001-3013. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 4/19/13. (jam)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER re 88 Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry): IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Borough of Jim Thorpe's Motion to Permissively Allow Lineal Descendants of Decedent to Join in this Matter and Participate with Court Ord ered Mediation (Doc. 82) and Defendant Borough of Jim Thorpe's Amended Motion to Permissively Allow Lineal Descendants of Decedent to Join in this Mattter and Participate with Court Ordered Mediation (Doc. 85) are DENIED. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 9/28/12. (jam, )
|
|
Filing
67
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part 34 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part 38 Motion to Dismiss; denying 46 Motion to Dismiss; granting 51 Motion for Leave to File; denying 53 Motion to Dismiss. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:1. Defendant Bor ough of Jim Thorpes Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint (Doc. 34) and the Individual Defendants Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint (Doc. 38) is GRANTED IN PART as follows:a. Plaintiffs claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is DISM ISSED.b. Plaintiffs claim under the Equal Access to Justice Act is DISMISSED.2. Defendant Borough of Jim Thorpes Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 25 (Doc. 46) and the Individual Defendants Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 25 (Doc. 53) is DENIED.3. Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Amend is GRANTED. Plaintiffs may amend their complaint within twenty-one (21) days of this order.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 11/23/11 (jam, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
