Jones v. Investment Retrievers, LLC et al
| Cathy Lee Jones |
| Investment Retrievers, LLC and Louis Swartz |
| 3:2010cv01714 |
| August 16, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Lackawanna |
| A. Richard Caputo |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION - For the foregoing reasons, the Court will grant Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Plaintiff's claims of failure to produce documents and harassing discovery requests. The Court will deny Defendants' Motions as to Plaintiff's claim that they engaged in deceptive/fraudulent practices to obtain an award at the arbitration hearing. A separate Order follows.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 5/11/12. (jfg)
|
|
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 16 Plaintiff's Motion seeking leave to file an amended complaint. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) The plaintiff's motion for leave to amend her complaint (Doc. 16) is GRANTED. (2) The Clerk of Court is direc ted to detach the Amended Complaint (Doc. 16) attached to Plaintiffs' Motion and file it of record forthwith. The Amended Complaint shall be deemed to have been served on the date of this Order for the purpose of determining the time for response under Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a). Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 7/25/11 (jam, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
