Dacenzo v. Crake
| Frederico A Dacenzo |
| Shannon Crake |
| 3:2010cv01776 |
| August 24, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Luzerne |
| Thomas M. Blewitt |
| William J. Nealon |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 61) is ADOPTED. The motions to dismiss (Docs. 47,48) are GRANTED. Plaintiff's second amended complaint (Doc.38) is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case. Any appeal will be deemed frivolous, lacking merit, and not taken in good faith.Signed by Honorable William J. Nealon on 8/16/12 (ga, )
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER - The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 15) is ADOPTED. Plaintiff's objections (Doc. 17) are OVERRULED. Plaintiff may file a second amended complaint within sixty (60) days of the date of this Order. This matter is remanded to Magistrate Judge Blewitt for further proceedings. Any appeal will be deemed frivolous, lacking merit, and not taken in good faith.Signed by Honorable William J. Nealon on 8/26/11. (ga, )
|
|
Filing
13
Order - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: The Report and Recommendations (Doc. 9) are ADOPTED. The above-captioned cases are CONSOLIDATED under Civil No. 10-1776. The Clerk of Cours shall mark Civil Nos. 10-1777 and 10-1778 CLOSED. Plaintiff may file an am ended complaint within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order and his failure to do so will result in a decision being reached on his Amendment filed on November 1, 2010 (Doc. 11). (See Order for further details)Signed by Honorable William J. Nealon on 11/17/10. (ga, )
|
|
Filing
9
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; IT IS RECOMMENDED that the three above captioned cases be consolidated, that Civil 3:10-CV-1777 and 1778 be closed, and that the matter proceed under Civil 3:10-CV-1776. Additionally, based on the foregoing, it is respectfu lly recommended that plf be directed to file one Amended Complaint against all 3 defts adhering to the standards set forth above. Further, it is recommended that, if plf fails, within the applicable time period, to file his Amended Complaint adhering to the standards set forth above, his action be dismissed. Finally, it is recommended that plf's consolidated case be remanded to the undersigned for further proceedings. NOTICE; Exceptions to be filed within l4 days. Objections to R&R due by 10/25/2010Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Blewitt on 10/8/10. (jb, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dacenzo v. Crake | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Frederico A Dacenzo | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Shannon Crake | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
