Dacenzo v. Olszewski

Dacenzo v. Olszewski

Plaintiff:	Frederico A Dacenzo
Defendant:	Peter Paul Olszewski, Jr.
Case Number:	3:2010cv01777
Filed:	August 24, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Scranton Office
County:	Luzerne
Presiding Judge:	Thomas M. Blewitt
Presiding Judge:	William J. Nealon
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 17, 2010	Filing 13 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 9 Report and Recommendations. This case is CONSOLIDATED into 10-cv-1776. Signed by Honorable William J. Nealon on 11/17/2010. (bg, )
October 8, 2010	Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; IT IS RECOMMENDED that the three above captioned cases be consolidated, that Civil 3:10-CV-1777 and 1778 be closed, and that the matter proceed under Civil 3:10-CV-1776. Additionally, based on the foregoing, it is respectfu lly recommended that plf be directed to file one Amended Complaint against all 3 defts adhering to the standards set forth above. Further, it is recommended that, if plf fails, within the applicable time period, to file his Amended Complaint adherin g to the standards set forth above, his action be dismissed. Finally, it is recommended that plf's consolidated case be remanded to the undersigned for further proceedings. NOTICE; Exceptions to be filed within l4 days. Objections to R&R due by 10/25/2010Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Blewitt on 10/8/10. (jb, )

Date Filed

Document Text

November 17, 2010

Filing 13 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 9 Report and Recommendations. This case is CONSOLIDATED into 10-cv-1776. Signed by Honorable William J. Nealon on 11/17/2010. (bg, )

October 8, 2010

Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; IT IS RECOMMENDED that the three above captioned cases be consolidated, that Civil 3:10-CV-1777 and 1778 be closed, and that the matter proceed under Civil 3:10-CV-1776. Additionally, based on the foregoing, it is respectfu lly recommended that plf be directed to file one Amended Complaint against all 3 defts adhering to the standards set forth above. Further, it is recommended that, if plf fails, within the applicable time period, to file his Amended Complaint adherin g to the standards set forth above, his action be dismissed. Finally, it is recommended that plf's consolidated case be remanded to the undersigned for further proceedings. NOTICE; Exceptions to be filed within l4 days. Objections to R&R due by 10/25/2010Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Blewitt on 10/8/10. (jb, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dacenzo v. Olszewski
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Frederico A Dacenzo
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Peter Paul Olszewski, Jr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?