Knight v. Lowry et al
| Lawrence H Knight, II |
| Lowry, BLACK, Sam, 4 other unknown CO's and Superintendent of SCI-Waymart |
| 3:2010cv02168 |
| October 21, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Cambria |
| PT |
| A. Richard Caputo |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) re 76 Response filed by Lawrence H. Knight, II Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 11/22/13. (jam)
|
|
Filing
74
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) re 69 Second MOTION to Compel Discovery filed by BLACK, Frechen, CO Leval, Lowry, 71 Third MOTION to Compel Discovery filed by BLACK, Frechen, CO Leval, Lowry , 72 MOTION for Extension of Time to Dispositive Motions Deadline Pending Disposition of Defendants' Motions to Compel Discovery filed by BLACK, Frechen, CO Leval, Lowry Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 10/21/13. (jam)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER denying 42 Motion to Appoint Counsel without prejudice. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 4/16/12 (jam, )
|
|
Filing
38
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 22 Motion to Dismiss; granting 28 Motion for Extension of Time to File. it is ordered that:1. The defendants motion to dismiss (Doc. 22) is granted in part and denied in part.2. The claim s against the defendants in their official capacities are hereby dismissed as barred by the doctrine of sovereign immunity. 3.All claims against Superintendent Nish are dismissed due to Mr. Knights failure to state a claim against him. 4. Mr. Knigh ts Eighth Amendment claim of deliberate indifference is dismissed with prejudice due to his failure to exhaust his available administrative remedies. 5.The sole remaining claim is Mr. Knights Eighth Amendment claim of excessive use of force against C O Black and CO Lowry.6.CO Black and CO Lowry are granted twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Order to file an Answer to the Complaint.7.Mr. Knights Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. 28) is granted.8.Within ten (10) days from the date of this Order Mr. Knight shall provide the Court with the sufficient information for the Marshal to effect service on CO Freechan, CO Leval and CO Herchik. 9.Plaintiffs failure to comply with 8 of this Order will result in the dismissal of this action against the unserved defendants (Freechan, Leval, Herchik and Does) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 3/7/12 (jam, )
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER denying 24 Motion for Appointment of Counsel without prejudice. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 7/19/11 (jam, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
