Elsevier Inc. et al v. Comprehensive Microfilm & Scanning Services, Inc. et al
| Elsevier Inc., Elsevier B.V., Elsevier Ltd., Mosby, Inc., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Blackwell Publishing, Ltd., Wiley Periodicals, Inc., Wiley-Liss, Inc. and American Chemical Society |
| Comprehensive Microfilm & Scanning Services, Inc., James A. Wasilewski and John Does Nos. 1-10 |
| 3:2010cv02513 |
| December 10, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Luzerne |
| Unassigned4 |
| Copyrights |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
237
ORDER upon consideration of Plaintiffs' Renewed 50(b) Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (Doc. 197), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT such Motion is DENIED and that the Judgment entered on December 13, 2013 shall stand unaltered.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 12/12/14. (jfg)
|
|
Filing
152
ORDER 1. Defendants' Motion to Compel Anthony DeStephen's presence at trial (Doc. 147) is DENIED. 2. Defendants' alternative oral request for a third deposition of Anthony DeStephens is DENIED. 3. The two deposition transcripts of Anth ony DeStephens that have been taken to date may be ADMITTED at trial in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 32(a){4)(C). 4. To the extent that there remain any unresolved objections to any portion of the DeStephen deposition transcripts, it is further ORDERED that the parties bring such objections to the attention of the COLirt before using the transcripts at trial.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 10/128/13. (jfg)
|
|
Filing
120
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION - For the reasons set forth in this memorandum opinion, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment, and Third-Party Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment will be denied.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 4/10/13. (jfg)
|
|
Filing
77
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER having considered Plaintiffs' and Third-Party Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Defendants' Third-Party Complaint and to Grant Plaintiffs Leave to Dismiss Their Unfair Competition Claim (Doc. 40), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Plaintiffs' and Third-Party Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Defendants' Third-Party Complaint and to Grant Plaintiffs Leave to Dismiss Their Unfair Competition Claim (Doc. 40) is DENIED.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 3/6/12. (jfg)
|
|
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting 19 Motion to join additional dfts; and granting 25 Motion for Leave to File amended complaint.Signed by Honorable James M. Munley on 5/17/11 (sm, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
