Pellicano v. Blue Cross Blue Shield Association et al
| Michael V Pellicano |
| Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, PA Blue Cross Blue Shield, CareFirst Blue Cross Blue Shield Maryland and The Office of Personnel Management, Insurance Operations |
| 3:2011cv00406 |
| March 2, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Lackawanna |
| Martin C. Carlson |
| Joel H. Slomsky |
| Insurance |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 635 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING THE 39 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS.1. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Carlson (Doc. No. 39) isAPPROVED. The Court agrees with the Report and Recommendation that Plaintiff has failed to state a cognizable claim against Defendant OPM and has not shown that default judgment shouldbe entered against Defendant OPM.2. The Motion to Dismiss of Defendant OPM (Doc. No. 32) is GRANTED.3. The Complaint (Doc. No. 1) shall be DISMISSED as to Defendant OPM.4. Plai ntiffs Motion for Default Judgment as to Defendant OPM (Doc. No~ 16) isDENIED.5. Plaintiffs Objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 41) areDENIED.6. In view of the fact that Defendant OPM is the only remaining Defendant in theabove-captioned case, the Clerk of Court shall close the case.Signed by Honorable Joel H. Slomsky on 5/18/2012. (bg, )
|
|
Filing
37
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 6 Motion to Dismiss; adopting in part 24 Report and Recommendations. 1. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Carlson is APPROVED. The Court agrees with the Report and Recommendat ion that Plaintiff has failed to state a cognizable claim against Blue Cross Defendants.2. Plaintiffs Objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 27) areGRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Court sustains Plaintiffs Objection to the time -frame of events giving rise to his claims, but denies his objections to the application ofthe Federal Employees Health Benefits Act to his claims and the finding that he failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.3. The Complaint (Doc. No.1) shall be DISMISSED as to Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, CareFirst Blue Cross Blue Shield Maryland, and P A Blue Cross Blue Shield onlySigned by Honorable Joel H. Slomsky on 2/8/2012 (bg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
