Adderly v. Eidem et al
| Nathaniel L. Adderly |
| C/O Eidem, Cowher, Glenn, Alshefski, Saxton, Balonis, Resendes, Wenerowicz, Kovalchik, Shannon, Dorina Varner, Braim, Wiedow, Dando, Damitter, Alberts, Jacobs, Svab and Kufro |
| 3:2011cv00694 |
| April 13, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Luzerne |
| LQ |
| Edwin M. Kosik |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
118
ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiff's motion (Doc. 98) for summary judgment is DENIED. 2. Defendants' second motion (Doc. 104) for summary judgment is GRANTED. Judgment shall be ENTERED in favor of Defendants Glenn, Reno and Al shefski, and against Plaintiff Nathaniel Adderly. 3. The claim against Defendant Cowher is DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this action 5. Any appeal from this Order is DEEMED frivolous and not in good faith.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 9/18/17 (jam)
|
|
Filing
102
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry). Signed by Honorable Edwin M. Kosik on 10/17/2016. (emksec, )
|
|
Filing
96
ORDER (1)Adopting in part 90 Report and Recommendations. (2) Granting in part and denying in part Deft's 77 Motion for Summary Judgment. (3) Defts are to file a Motion for Sum Judgmt on remaining claims w/in 20 days. (4) Clerk to Forward a copy to Mag.Judge. Signed by Honorable Edwin M. Kosik on 9/28/2016 (rm)
|
|
Filing
60
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry).Signed by Honorable Edwin M. Kosik on 2/20/2015. (bg)
|
|
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry)Signed by Honorable Edwin M. Kosik on 2/18/14. (ts)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER: Defendant's Motion to dismiss portions of the Complaint (Doc. 11) is GRANTED. Plaintiff will be afforded fifteeen (15) days within which to submit an amended complaint in strict accordance with the foregoing Memorandum. He is reminded th at the amended complaint must include all claims going forward in this action. The failure to submit an amended complaint will result in the case proceeding only on Pltff's Eighth Amendment claim against Deft. Weidow and his retaliation claim against Deft. Kufro.Signed by Honorable Edwin M. Kosik on 8/6/12. (lh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
