Hill v. Fisher et al
| Tyrone Hill |
| Jon D. Fisher, R.S. Hannah, Lisa Hollibaugh, D.A. Kuhn, J Eichenlaub, John Rivello, B.M. Booher and K.E. Kauffman |
| 3:2011cv01034 |
| May 31, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Huntingdon |
| JV |
| Richard P. Conaboy |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
150
ORDER granting 132 Motion for Sanctions. Kauffman shall pay Hill the sum of $500.00 to compensate Hill for the breach of the Order. Such payment shall be made within 60 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 9/25/19 (jam)
|
|
Filing
144
ORDER denying 142 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 8/29/19 (jam)
|
|
Filing
140
MEMORANDUM OPINION (Order to follow as separate docket entry) re 132 MOTION for Sanctions filed by Tyrone Hill.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 8/7/19. (jam)
|
|
Filing
101
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry)In conclusion, the Remaining Defendant's motion (Doc. 87) seeking summary judgment will be granted in part. Summary judgment will be granted with respect to the failure to intervene claim but denied in regards to the failure to protect allegation. An appropriate Order will enter. re 87 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by John Rivello Signed by Honorable Richard P. Conaboy on 3/7/16. (cc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
