Kromelbein v. Envision Payment Solutions, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Third Circuit Pennsylvania Middle District Kromelbein v. Envision Payment Solutions, Inc.

Kromelbein v. Envision Payment Solutions, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Harold Lee Kromelbein
Defendant:	Envision Payment Solutions, Inc.
Case Number:	3:2011cv01598
Filed:	August 25, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Scranton Office
County:	Bradford
Presiding Judge:	A. Richard Caputo
Nature of Suit:	Consumer Credit
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 1, 2013	Filing 47 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry),1.) The motion for summary judgment, (Doc. No. 18), is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. 2.)The motion for summary judgment on plaintiffs 15 U.S.C. §1692d claims will be DENIED.3.) T he motion seeking dismissal of plaintiffs claims under 15 U.S.C. §1692e will be GRANTED as to the claims concerning the failure to identify the original creditor and the false statement that plaintiffs drivers license was recorded but DENIED as to the claims that plaintiffs check writing could be affected and the statement that civil and criminal actions could be filed against plaintiff. 4.)The motion for summary judgment on plaintiffs 15 U.S.C. §1692f claim will be GRANTED. 5.)The mot ion for summary judgment on plaintiffs 15 U.S.C. §1692g(a) claim will be DENIED. 6.)The motion for summary judgment on plaintiffs 15 U.S.C. §1692g(b) claim will be GRANTED. Motions terminated: 18 Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 8/1/13. (bs)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 1, 2013

Filing 47 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry),1.) The motion for summary judgment, (Doc. No. 18), is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. 2.)The motion for summary judgment on plaintiffs 15 U.S.C. §1692d claims will be DENIED.3.) T he motion seeking dismissal of plaintiffs claims under 15 U.S.C. §1692e will be GRANTED as to the claims concerning the failure to identify the original creditor and the false statement that plaintiffs drivers license was recorded but DENIED as to the claims that plaintiffs check writing could be affected and the statement that civil and criminal actions could be filed against plaintiff. 4.)The motion for summary judgment on plaintiffs 15 U.S.C. §1692f claim will be GRANTED. 5.)The mot ion for summary judgment on plaintiffs 15 U.S.C. §1692g(a) claim will be DENIED. 6.)The motion for summary judgment on plaintiffs 15 U.S.C. §1692g(b) claim will be GRANTED. Motions terminated: 18 Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 8/1/13. (bs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kromelbein v. Envision Payment Solutions, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Harold Lee Kromelbein
Represented By:	Craig Thor Kimmel
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Envision Payment Solutions, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?