Varner v. MHS, Ltd.

Varner v. MHS, Ltd.

Plaintiff:	Robert S. Varner
Defendant:	MHS, Ltd.
Case Number:	3:2011cv02138
Filed:	November 15, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Scranton Office
County:	Bradford
Presiding Judge:	Richard P. Conaboy
Nature of Suit:	Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By:	Both

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 6, 2014	Filing 40 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) defendants motion for summary judgment, (Doc. 20), is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Summary judgment is GRANTED as to plaintiffs claims for design defect, failure to warn, and breach of the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose. Defendants motion for summary judgment is DENIED as to plaintiffs claims for manufacturing defect and breach of the implied warranty of merchantability Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/2 4/2014 02:30 PM in Scranton before Honorable Malachy E Mannion. Jury Selection set for 5/19/2014 09:30 AM in Scranton before Honorable Malachy E Mannion. Jury Trial set for 5/19/2014 09:30 AM in Scranton before Honorable Malachy E Mannion.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 3/6/14. (bs)
January 6, 2014	Filing 29 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), THAT defendants summary judgment motion, (Doc. No. 20), is GRANTED. Judgment is entered for the defendant. The Clerk is directed to close the case.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 1/6/14. (bs)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 6, 2014

Filing 40 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) defendants motion for summary judgment, (Doc. 20), is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Summary judgment is GRANTED as to plaintiffs claims for design defect, failure to warn, and breach of the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose. Defendants motion for summary judgment is DENIED as to plaintiffs claims for manufacturing defect and breach of the implied warranty of merchantability Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/2 4/2014 02:30 PM in Scranton before Honorable Malachy E Mannion. Jury Selection set for 5/19/2014 09:30 AM in Scranton before Honorable Malachy E Mannion. Jury Trial set for 5/19/2014 09:30 AM in Scranton before Honorable Malachy E Mannion.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 3/6/14. (bs)

January 6, 2014

Filing 29 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), THAT defendants summary judgment motion, (Doc. No. 20), is GRANTED. Judgment is entered for the defendant. The Clerk is directed to close the case.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 1/6/14. (bs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Varner v. MHS, Ltd.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert S. Varner
Represented By:	James R. Carroll
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: MHS, Ltd.
Represented By:	Daniel E. Cummins
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?