Etheredge v. Henry et al
| James Etheredge |
| M.L. Henry, Gerald Brahl, Judith Holly Storms, Nick Saites and John Nederostack |
| 3:2011cv02330 |
| December 16, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Monroe |
| Robert D. Mariani |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
ORDER upon consideration of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 65), and all accompanying briefs, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 65) is GRANTED. 2. The Court enters judgment in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff. 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to CLOSE the case.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 3/24/15. (jfg)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER 1. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (Doc. 41) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. a. Plaintiffs gender-based Equal Protection claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. b. All facts arising before March 2008 in support of Plainti ffs sole remaining claim of an Equal Protection violation based on his sexual orientation are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. i. Accordingly, Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Equal Protection claim based on sexual orientation is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. c. Additionally, Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of personal involvement isDENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 1/6/14. (jfg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
