Moore v. Lamas et al
| Thomas Moore |
| Morirosa Lamas, Kenny Granlund and Jeff Hortor |
| 3:2012cv00223 |
| February 6, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Erie |
| JV |
| Richard P. Conaboy |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
188
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Thomas Moore's motions in limine (Doc. 181-4; Doc. 181-6) are DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Matthew W. Brann on 11/18/2021. (jr)
|
|
Filing
175
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 166 Defendants' Motion in Limine is granted subject to the conditions detailed in the Memorandum Opinion. Signed by Chief Judge Matthew W. Brann on 11/3/2021. (lg)
|
|
Filing
147
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 141 Defendants' motion in limine is granted in part and denied in part. (See order for further/complete details.) Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 3/18/2020. (lg)
|
|
Filing
128
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 117 and 120 are denied; the Court will schedule a status conferenc call by separate order. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 6/18/19. (lg)
|
|
Filing
114
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry)Given that Plaintiff has previously given testimony in this matter asserting that a prison official engaged in a fraudulent attempt to withdraw the inmates grievance against Defendants Hall, Perks, and Fisher; this Courts previously expressed concerns about the adequacy of the investigative procedures undertaken at SCI-Rockview with respect to Moore; and the failure of Remaining Defendants to submit supporting affidavits or declarations under penalty of perjury, this Court is not satisfied that Remaining Defendants have met their burden of demonstrating by properly supported evidentiary facts that there is the absence of a genuine issue of material fact. Remaining Defendants Hall, Perks, and Fishers request for entry of partial summary judgment will be denied. An appropriate Order will enter.Signed by Honorable Richard P. Conaboy on 9/26/18. (cc)
|
|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry)A decision as to whether this Court should exercise jurisdiction over any state law tort claims against the Defendants will be held in abeyance pending resolution of all dispositive motions. An appropriate Order will enter. (See Memorandum) Signed by Honorable Richard P. Conaboy on 2/7/14. (cc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
