McCullon v. Saylor et al
| Michael Tyrone McCullon |
| William Brenneman, M. Saylor, John Doe's Correctional Officers, J. Hepner, Randy Johnson, W. McFadden, S Gosa, Beverly Prince and D Mink |
| 3:2012cv00445 |
| March 12, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Union |
| Edwin M. Kosik |
| Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 41 ; granting 18 Motion to Dismiss and/or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment; Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defts and against Pltf; Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case and forward a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the Magistrate Judge; Signed by Honorable Edwin M. Kosik on 03/22/13. (ep)
|
|
Filing
35
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiffs motion for leave to amend is GRANTED, and the Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint identifying all John Doe Defendants on or before September 5, 2012. Amended Pleadings due by 9/5/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on August 22, 2012. (kjn )
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 11 Report and Recommendations, DENYING 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Michael Tyrone McCullon, ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson; Signed by Honorable Edwin M. Kosik on 04/23/12. (ep, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
