Sarnoski v. Scranton Police Dept. et al
||Kristen Lee Sarnoski
||Nathaniel Williams, Sr., Christian Gowerty and Scranton Police Dept.
||March 20, 2012
||US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
||A. Richard Caputo
|Nature of Suit:
||Other Civil Rights
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|August 21, 2012
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:(1)The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 14) is ADOPTED.(2)Plaintiffs Amended Complaint (Doc. 13) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.(3)The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this matter as CLOSEDSigned by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 8/21/12. (jam, )
|June 12, 2012
ORDER re 11 Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry), ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:(1) Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2) is GRANTED.(2) Magistrate Judge Carlsons Report and Recommendation to Plaintiffs Complaint (Doc. 5) is REJECTED in part and ADOPTED IN PART. The Recommendation to dismiss Plaintiffs claims is ADOPTED. The Recommendation to dismiss the action is REJECTED. Plaintiff may fil e an amended complaint within a time period to be established by the Magistrate Judge. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within this time period, her claims will be dismissed without prejudice. (3)The matter is RECOMMITTED to Magistrate Judge Carlson for further proceedings.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 6/12/12. (jam, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?