Moulton v. Sabol
Petitioner: Benjamin Moulton
Respondent: Mary Sabol
Case Number: 3:2012cv00922
Filed: May 17, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Scranton Office
County: York
Presiding Judge: Thomas M. Blewitt
Presiding Judge: William J. Nealon
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in part re: 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Benjamin Moulton, 8 Report and Recommendations.Petition is dismissed as moot, any appeal filed will be deemed fivolous. This case is CLOSED.Signed by Honorable William J. Nealon on 12/3/2012. (bg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moulton v. Sabol
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Benjamin Moulton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Mary Sabol
Represented By: Mark Morrison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?