Perez et al v. Great Wolf Lodge of the Poconos, LLC et al
Plaintiff: |
Brian Perez and Jennifer Perez |
Defendant: |
Great Wolf Lodge of the Poconos, LLC and Great Wolf Resorts, Inc. |
Case Number: |
3:2012cv01322 |
Filed: |
July 9, 2012 |
Court: |
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Office: |
Scranton Office |
County: |
Monroe |
Presiding Judge: |
Robert D. Mariani |
Nature of Suit: |
Other Personal Injury |
Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Jury Demanded By: |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
February 10, 2017 |
Filing
314
ORDER 1. Defendants' Motion to Extend Case Management Deadlines, (Doc. 236), is DENIED. 2. Defendants' Motion to Compel, (Doc. 243), is DENIED.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 2/9/17. (jfg)
|
January 3, 2017 |
Filing
233
ORDER 1. Plaintiffs' Motion, (Doc. 197), is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as reflected in the Court's accompanying memorandum opinion. 2. Defendants' investigator Mr. Colgan shall be precluded from testifying with respect to his p ersonal observations of Plaintiffs and may only testify to authenticate the video surveillance of Plaintiffs. 3. Defendants shall pay Plaintiffs' attorneys fees and costs incurred as a result of bringing this motion. 4.Plaintiffs shall have four teen (14) days from the date of this order to submit an itemization of their fees and costs and Defendants shall thereafter have fourteen (14) days to raise any objections to Plaintiffs' fees and costs.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 1/3/17. (jfg)
|
July 26, 2016 |
Filing
201
ORDER upon consideration of Defendants' Supplemental Motion in Limine, (Doc. 126), and all documents filed in support and in opposition to the motion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Defendants' motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 7/26/16. (jfg)
|
July 2, 2015 |
Filing
137
ORDER 1. The Report &Recommendation (Doc. 134) is ADOPTED for the reasons stated therein. However, the Court declines to express any opinion as to whether "some sanction may be necessary and appropriate in this case" (Doc. 134, at 12) and l eaves that question for another time, should the issue arise.2. Plaintiffs' Motion for Sanctions (Doc. 76) is DENIED. 3. The Report & Recommendation (Doc. 135) is ADOPTED for the reasons stated therein. 4.Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Ame nd Complaint (Doc. 37) is GRANTED and all further proceedings shall be conducted on the basis of the amended complaint.5. Defendants shall withdraw their motion for summary judgment (Doc. 66) with leave to re-file a new motion for summary judgment at an appropriate time in the future.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 7/2/15 (jfg)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?