Adderly v. Stofko et al
| Nathaniel L. Adderly |
| Stofko, Domagauer, White, Kondraski, Kotz, Wilde, Lynch, Larson, Piazza, Lt. Ameen, Orswick, Wicht, Bleich, Ron and Kawalski |
| 3:2012cv01546 |
| August 9, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Luzerne |
| LQ |
| Edwin M. Kosik |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry). Signed by Honorable Edwin M. Kosik on 7/21/2016. (emksec, )
|
|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry). Signed by Honorable Edwin M. Kosik on 8/11/2015. (emksec, )
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). Defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint(Doc.33) is granted as set forth in the attached Memorandum and Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within twenty (20) days from the d ate of this order. The amended complaint shall contain the same case number that is presently assigned to this action, 3:12-cv-1546, and shall be direct, concise, and shall stand alone without reference to any other document filed in this matter. Plaintiff's motion to file a supplemental complaint (Doc.40) is denied as moot.Signed by Honorable Edwin M. Kosik on 2/3/15. (ga)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
